Automated Testing Software

Seems all right so far. I only have been using it for a while. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The phones that run on the cloud provide a very similar experience to an actual device. Plus you get to choose the devices with different physical sizes to check how the app looks and feels. As a non-tech person, I also wanted something simple and no-code. BrowserStack has provided that experience where it is as easy as using the phone.

the automated summary of the session with annotated screenshots has reduced the distraction of maintaining notes and interacting with the app. So that has also reduced the brain cycles involved in the audits. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is very helpful and I don't see any cons while using it. The main issue I could see is we need to delete previous screenshots while trying to log another bug in the same session Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Manual Testing, Automation Testing Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One downside of LaunchDarkly is its complexity at scale, particularly when managing a large number of feature flags across multiple environments. It can be challenging to maintain flag hygiene, and the cost can increase significantly as the usage grows. Additionally, the UI might feel cluttered when dealing with numerous flags, making it difficult to find specific ones quickly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

LaunchDarkly helps streamline A/B testing and feature management by allowing us to toggle features on and off without deploying new code. This enables faster and safer releases, reduces deployment risks, and facilitates experimentation with different versions of features in real-time. It also allows us to target specific user segments, which helps in gathering insights and feedback, ultimately leading to better product decisions and user experiences. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't like that in the web version when I merge with another branch the changes are passed to both branches, this is usually counterproductive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Previously we did not have a CD/CI with which we could deploy our projects automatically, with GitHub we were able to solve this. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

First of all, I am as a User frustated with searching capabilities of GitLab. For instance, when I am searching for snippet of code across tens of projects, it can't provide easy yet effective searching mechanism. Also, there is a bit of learning curve in terms of user interface, so it might be an obstacle for newcomers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Majority of my work time is devoted to code review, therefore it's paramount to have a platform to review the MRs in easy and accessable way for me, especially when code changes affecting several classes/items. With GitLab, it's super easy to request reviews, leave comments, and collaborate with your teammates. GitLab's CI/CD pipelines are also one of the benefits of using GitLab - you just push your code to your branch, and everything else is automated (except for the bugs - this is on your side). Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The only minor issue I've found is that when I am wanting to rearrange one of my Test Suites, I can only move a test suite up/down one space at a time. I can still get the test suite to where I can to but it would be more efficient if I could move it there in one go. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It has helped our company to efficiently organise our test cases within a simple and user friendly interface. It's reporting has also helped to us to track projects easier and made it easier to feed information up to the higher business levels. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

No negatives in my experience, hands down the best QA service I've had the pleasure of using. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

QA Wolf takes the overhead of automation and front end testing off our plate so that we can focus on shipping new features and iterating on our development. This simplifies our workflow and allows us to ship faster and more consistently. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There is not much to dislike in Postman, but few are: 1.) I can add only limited member in a team with a basic/free plan. 2.) Sometimes, I get 429 for repeated API calls. 3.) Sometimes I also feel like Postman should also allow the user to manage workspace as code blocks rather limiting it to endpoints only. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It provides various features that solve common problems faced during API development and interaction:

1.) Simplifies API Testing and Debugging : Simplifies API testing by providing a visual interface for interacting with APIs, making it easy for developers and testers to debug requests and responses.

2.) Collaborative API Development : Increases productivity by providing a shared environment for developers, testers, and stakeholders to collaborate on APIs.

3.) Comprehensive API Documentation : Saves time by generating real-time documentation and provides a clear reference for developers using or consuming the API. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While AutoRABIT is feature-rich, the initial setup and implementation can be somewhat complex, especially for organizations with less technical expertise. The user interface, though functional, could benefit from a more modern and intuitive design. At times, the platform's performance can be sluggish, particularly when dealing with large data sets or complex environments using Dataloader. Lastly, the pricing might be a bit steep for smaller teams or organizations with limited budgets, making it more suitable for mid to large-sized enterprises. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

AutoRABIT addresses several key challenges in our Salesforce development lifecycle. Firstly, it simplifies and automates the deployment process, reducing the risk of manual errors and significantly speeding up release cycles. This has enabled our team to deploy changes more frequently and with greater confidence. Secondly, AutoRABIT's version control system ensures that all changes are tracked, making it easier to manage code conflicts and rollbacks if necessary. The platform’s robust backup and recovery features protect our data, ensuring business continuity even in the event of unexpected issues. Overall, AutoRABIT has streamlined our DevOps operations, improved efficiency, and enhanced the security of our Salesforce environment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As with anything Metadata api based in Salesforce the system has to work around the complexities of the SalesForce object architecture. The data dictionary does take us a long way to getting past this however. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It gives us exact visibility into our customers Salesforce Orgs and helps us find the inflection points for our implementations. One example is an implementation that was hung up for 3 days on a problem, within 15 minutes of connecting sonar we worked past it. Its a lifesaver as is Brad and Kevin from their team. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

New users may experience difficulty learning the platform quickly and fully utilizing all its capabilities, thus prompting more comprehensive tutorials or user guides would aid greatly in quickly understanding all its capabilities. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

ContextQA has simplified our regression and API testing significantly by automating them - saving us both manual effort and errors while speeding up release cycles through its AI-powered auto-healing and visual regression testing features. This has made a big impactful statement about their commitment to high software quality with faster release cycles! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

For me, would be better add a text field type to the test steps. So, if the project has no need to step-by-step or a gherkin, just a text box where describe the flow is enough Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

A simple but customizable test management tool, for a small team (only 1 dev and 1 QA) and integration of Jira. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While Testomat.io is powerful, one of the areas for improvement could be the learning curve. Some of the advanced features may take time to get familiar with, especially for new users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Testomat.io addresses the challenge of reporting and transparency in testing processes. Its robust reporting features ensure that all stakeholders, from manual testers to automation engineers, can easily track progress, results, and issues in real-time. This transparency improves communication and collaboration within the team, leading to more efficient testing cycles and higher-quality software releases. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing is there to dislike salesforce lightning platform. there were serious breathing issues, which describes productivity. Sometimes the loading screen take longer than salesforce classic. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Pre-existing relationships

Breadth of services

Product roadmap and future vision

Product functionality and performance

Overall cost

Strong customer focus

Financial/organizational viability

Strong user community

Strong consulting partnership

Strong services expertise Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

- Cost. For teams which has mutiple development and deployment environments with a higher frequency of commit/deployments the cost will be a little high. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We use Semaphore as for the CI/CD pipeline. It helps to identify if any commit or merge might cause any issue in workflow by running all test cases before merge or deploy. We use the auto promotion feature to deploy the code updates after the successful tests. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We have some pretty complicated build pipelines and occasionally a build step will fail. If we just rerun the step the next time it will usually pass. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

When automating builds for medium to large sized applications there are a lot of steps to manage from downloading dependencies and running automated tests to signing, configuring, and deploying. It can be very tedious to try and script all that out by hand. Bitrise makes that much easier by giving you pre made steps do handle a lot of those tasks for you. They also keep you from having to setup and manage dedicated build machines to run the build pipelines on. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I'm yet to come across any issues at all and therefore can't honestly find fault with the app. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Keeping track of changes and ensuring everything that gets sent to the production server is all built and ready is a pain without any tool like this and DeployHQ does it really well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Though Jenkins is definitely a useful and adaptable tool, there are some parts that I find problematic. Its high level of complexity in installation and configuration is the most significant disadvantage. The newbies might be confused by numerous options and plug-ins that are available in Jenkins. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Jenkins has played a very important role in solving several crucial challenges that are present in our SDLC mainly in the aspects of CI/CD. All of it was manual before Jenkins and we used to have many times human errors because the build and deployment was done manually, hence the release delay and an irregular build quality. Jenkins has changed this a lot by actually automating the chain and code integration and deployment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

* Our complex test/staging/prod environment setup means that some of the dashboards are harder to follow, a way to create a custom dashboard would be great

* When using the approval system changes get applied the moment all approvals are granted, which has caught my team unaware, we know it now though (we are use to merge request workflows where the person submitting a change controls when it's applied) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Where I work we have a two weekly release cycle, being able to launch feature behind splits and switch over at opportune moments is crucial. We would often have to hand roll this kind of stuff into our own app/conf/DB...etc. in the past. Now it's just a few clicks over on split and a few lines of code here and there Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main downside comes not from Flosum itself, but from the architectural fact that it is in the end hosted on Salesforce platform itself, meaning that it also needs to adher all Salesforce platform limits, sometimes causing performance issues. However, solutions to these bottlenecks are already being developed afaik. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Very heterogeneous level of knowledge across the team.

Complex, multi-org architecture and release landscape.

Faster, but also more reliable and scalable deployment processes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.